Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint was based on the assertion that the treatment in question had "occurred over the course of four visits from September 7, 1990 to October 2, 1990", and that the plaintiffs had not filed a summons with notice until July 12, 1993, "more than 2-½ years after completion of the treatment at issue". However, the plaintiffs demonstrated, the Supreme Court found, and the defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
