In this underinsured motorist coverage case, the IAS Court properly found that the language of the policy, which cross-referenced the terms uninsured and underinsured, would lead a policyholder to the reasonable conclusion that she had also purchased underinsurance. Plaintiffs' recovery was correctly limited to $10,000, the amount clearly listed in the policy for uninsured motorist coverage. We have considered plaintiffs' remaining argument and find it...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
