1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 69 F.3d
  5. 69 F.3d 512 (1995)
 

UNISPLAY v. AMERICAN ELECTRONIC SIGN CO.

No. 95-1085.

69 F.3d 512 (1995)

UNISPLAY, S.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN ELECTRONIC SIGN CO., INC., Defendant, and Luke G. Williams, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined December 28, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Ross Boundy, Christensen, O'Connor, Johnson & Kindness, Seattle, Washington, argued, for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Stacy Quan.

Paul T. Meiklejohn, Seed and Berry, Seattle, Washington, argued, for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Ramsey M. Al-Salam and Clarence T. Tegreene. Also on the brief was Lawrence R. Small, Paine, Hamblen, Coffin, Brooke & Miller, Spokane, Washington.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined December 28, 1995.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Luke G. Williams appeals from the orders and final judgments of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington concluding that Unisplay S.A.'s U.S. Patent 4,163,332 (the '332 patent) is not invalid; that Williams infringed claims 9, 10, and 13 of the '332 patent; and that Williams is liable for damages, increased damages, and attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases