PURCELL v. CITY OF NEW YORK


215 A.D.2d 360 (1995)

626 N.Y.S.2d 966

Frank Purcell, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 1, 1995


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff's motion, although denominated as one to "renew", was in effect a motion to reargue, since the plaintiff did not allege any new facts in support of the motion (see, Elias v Handler, 181 A.D.2d 656). As no appeal lies from an order denying reargument, the appeal from the November 8, 1993, order must be dismissed.

We note, in any event, that if this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases