The court should have conducted a hearing to determine whether defendant, accused of running a drug ring, was aware of the potential risks arising out of his attorney's past representation of one of his operatives who testified against him at trial (see, People v Gomberg,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SUTTON
220 A.D.2d 351 (1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 122
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Troy Sutton, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 31, 1995
October 31, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.