1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 69 F.3d
  5. 69 F.3d 501 (1995)
 

MUNOZ v. STRAHM FARMS, INC.

Appeal No. 95-1036.

69 F.3d 501 (1995)

Miguel A. MUNOZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRAHM FARMS, INC., Fernando Flores, E. Schaffner Packaging Co., Schaffner Farms, Jimmy Castro, Samco Packing & Equipment, Inc. and Valley Harvesting & Packing, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 24, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darren J. Quinn, Branscomb Decicco Kopelowitz & Quinn, San Diego, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jay S. Kopelowitz.

John Allcock, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich, San Diego, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Rodney S. Edmonds.

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, NIES, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Miguel A. Munoz appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California declaring U.S. Patent 4,616,468 invalid based on a jury verdict finding the patented invention anticipated. Miguel A. Munoz v. Strahm Farms, Inc., No. 910864 S (M) (S.D.Cal. Sept. 6, 1994). Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in making evidentiary rulings, we affirm. Also, because Munoz's appeal is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases