DEE v. SWEET

No. A95A0782.

460 S.E.2d 110 (1995)

218 Ga. App. 18

DEE et al. v. SWEET et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Certiorari Denied October 13, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McKenney & Froelich, William J. McKenney, David M. Kupsky, Atlanta, for appellants.

Kilpatrick & Cody, Matthew H. Patton, James F. Bogan III, Atlanta, for appellees.


RUFFIN, Judge.

Defendants William Dee and Arthur McMahon appeal from the jury's verdict in favor of plaintiffs Robert Sweet and Ralph Wright, and the denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

After the acrimonious termination of the parties' business relationship, Sweet and Wright sued Dee and McMahon asserting various claims including violations of the Georgia Racketeer Influence & Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), fraud, libel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases