Substantial evidence supports respondent's finding that petitioner sold an alcoholic beverage to an underage undercover police cadet without asking for identification in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1). The officer's description of the bartender who served the beverage raised an issue of credibility to be determined by the finder of fact (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.