The evidence at the fact-finding hearing was more than sufficient to show that respondent failed to comply with the suspended judgment. Respondent was fully informed of the consequences of noncompliance, and thus was not harmed by the omission in the judgment of the warning required by 22 NYCRR 205.50 (b) that noncompliance could lead to its revocation. We agree with Family Court that the children's best interests would be served by terminating the parental rights of respondent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
