1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 216 A.D.2d
  5. 216 A.D.2d 351 (1995)
 

CROSSLAND SAV. v. FRIEDMAN

216 A.D.2d 351 (1995)

628 N.Y.S.2d 528

Crossland Savings, Fsb, Respondent, v. Morris Friedman, Also Known as Peter Friedman, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 12, 1995

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the plaintiff was not required to personally serve them with notice of the adjourned date of the foreclosure sale since the appellants failed to serve an answer to the complaint or a notice of appearance, or make a motion which would have had the effect of extending their time to answer (see, CPLR 320). Moreover, the appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases