There was sufficient evidence presented at trial to support the jury's conclusion that defendant, a former employee of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, entered into an agreement with a fellow employee whereby that employee would leak confidential bid information to two contractors, in return for a share of the bribe money the defendant would collect from those contractors.
The court properly balanced the probative value of evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
