TESLER v. PARAMOUNT INS. CO.


220 A.D.2d 334 (1995)

633 N.Y.S.2d 119

Martin Tesler et al., Respondents, v. Paramount Insurance Company, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 26, 1995


Renewal was properly denied since the Workers' Compensation Board decision upon which defendant relies had been in existence for almost 18 months prior to defendant's initial motion for summary judgment, and should have been brought to the court's attention at that time (Foley v Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558, 568). In any event, even if a more flexible approach to renewal were warranted here (see, De Almeida v Finesod,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases