MALMIN v. MINNESOTA MUT. FIRE & CAS. CO.

No. C1-95-1274.

541 N.W.2d 4 (1995)

David E. MALMIN, et al., Appellants, v. MINNESOTA MUTUAL FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted February 9, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for Appellants.

Robert S. Cragg, Cragg & Fobbe, Hopkins, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by SHORT, P.J., and PARKER and KLAPHAKE, JJ.


OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellants David E. Malmin and Jeanette Malmin1 (Malmin) brought this action against respondent Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Company (Minnesota Mutual) to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits. Malmin moved for summary judgment, arguing that a policy provision requiring Minnesota Mutual's written consent to any suit against a tortfeasor was void, unenforceable and against public policy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases