We find that the IAS Court properly dismissed the first cause of action for breach of contract as against defendant Titan, which was not a signatory to the agreement between defendant Solaris and plaintiff. Nor did Solaris have either actual or apparent authority to act as Titan's agent in connection with the marketing and advertising campaign for a particular brand of vitamins (cf., Riverside Research Inst. v KMGA, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BELLINO SCHWARTZ PADOB ADVER., INC. v. SOLARIS MKTG. GROUP, INC.
222 A.D.2d 313 (1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 587
Bellino Schwartz Padob Advertising, Inc., Appellant, v. Solaris Marketing Group, Inc., et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 19, 1995
December 19, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
