1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 285 N.J.
  5. 285 N.J. Super. 245 (1995)
 

PFUNDSTEIN v. OMNICOM GROUP INC.

285 N.J. Super. 245 (1995)

666 A.2d 1013

ROBERT G. PFUNDSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. OMNICOM GROUP INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 13, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neal H. Klausner argued the cause for appellant (Davis & Gilbert, attorneys; Mr. Klausner and Howard J. Rubin, of counsel and on the brief).

Michael Patrick Carroll argued the cause for respondent (Roy E. Kurnos, attorney, and on the brief; Mr. Carroll, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges LONG, MUIR, Jr. and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, P.J.A.D.

By our leave, defendant, Omnicom Group, Inc., appeals from the trial judge's order denying its motion to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiff, Robert G. Pfundstein, for lack of jurisdiction. Because we have concluded that Omnicom's contacts in this forum are insufficient to justify the exercise of personal jurisdiction over it, we reverse.

In 1986...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases