Defendant's claim that his plea was not knowingly entered because he misunderstood the minimum sentence he could receive in exchange for his guilty plea on the offered charge and the maximum sentence he could receive if convicted after trial is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, since he did not move to withdraw the plea before sentencing or to vacate the judgment of conviction (People v Ortiz,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.