1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 208 A.D.2d
  5. 208 A.D.2d 297 (1995)
 

DAVIS v. ROSENBLATT

208 A.D.2d 297 (1995)

Reuben K. Davis et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Albert Rosenblatt, as Administrative Judge and Chief Administrator of the Courts of The State of New York, et al., Respondents-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 16, 1995

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pearl & Smith, Rochester (Robert J. Pearl of counsel), and Joseph A.F. Valenti, Rochester, for appellants-respondents.

Michael Colodner, New York City (Angela M. Yodice and John Eiseman of counsel), Office of Court Administration, for Albert Rosenblatt, respondent-appellant.

Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Edward V. Regan and another, respondents-appellants.

MIKOLL, J. P., CREW III, WHITE and PETERS, JJ., concur.

MERCURE, J.

Plaintiffs are current and former Rochester City Court Judges who obtained a judgment, inter alia, declaring that the disparity between their salaries and those paid to Utica City Court Judges violated their right to equal protection under the law (see, Davis v Rosenblatt, 159 A.D.2d 163, 172, appeals dismissed 77 N.Y.2d 834,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases