1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 222 A.D.2d
  5. 222 A.D.2d 280 (1995)
 

LEONARD FUCHS, INC. v. LASER PROCESSING CORP.

222 A.D.2d 280 (1995)

635 N.Y.S.2d 224

Leonard Fuchs, Inc., Respondent, v. Laser Processing Corp. et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 14, 1995

A motion to renew should not be granted based upon evidence known to the moving party at the time of the original motion unless the moving party offers a reasonable excuse for not having submitted such evidence on the original motion (Halliday v Halliday, 218 A.D.2d 729; Segall v Heyer, 161 A.D.2d 471). We agree with the Appellate Term that no such excuse was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases