1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 461 S.E.2d
  5. 461 S.E.2d 39 (1995)
 

MURPHY v. MURPHY

No. 24295.

461 S.E.2d 39 (1995)

Rosemary MURPHY, Respondent, v. James Lee MURPHY, James Berl, Guardian ad Litem for Tyler Lee Murphy and Alexandra Russell Murphy, minor children, Defendants, Of whom James Lee Murphy is Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided August 7, 1995.

Rehearing Denied September 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Rauch Wise, of Wise & Tunstall, Greenwood, for appellant.

Peter Fuge, of Harvey & Battey, P.A., Beaufort, for respondent.

BURNETT, Judge:

In this domestic litigation, the family court judge (1) determined that Appellant's entire pension fund constituted marital property; (2) determined that Appellant's investment account, as well as the income produced from it, constituted marital property, and divided the account equally between the parties; (3) ordered sequestration of the investment account; and (4) denied Appellant's motion for recusal. We affirm.

FACTS

Rosemary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases