JUE v. PATTON

Docket No. A064503.

33 Cal.App.4th 456 (1995)

39 Cal. Rptr.2d 364

JUN W. JUE et al., Cross-complainants and Respondents, v. MIKE PATTON et al., Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

March 24, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Godfrey L. Munter, Jr., Duane W. Dresser and Thomas L. Bloxham for Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean, Charles A. Hansen and Steven M. Morger for Cross-complainants and Respondents.


OPINION

PERLEY, J.

Mike Patton and Margaret Tam (appellants) appeal from an order denying attorney fees pursuant to a real estate sales contract. They contend that as prevailing parties they are entitled to attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure sections 1032 and 1033.5. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This litigation arises from a dispute concerning the purchase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases