FORBES v. I.N.S.

No. 93-70016.

48 F.3d 439 (1995)

Ronald Ingle FORBES, Rhea Alfreda Forbes, Susan Ingle Forbes, Maria Ingle Forbes, Douglas Gordon Ingles Forbes, Robert Stephen Ingle Forbes, Catherine Ingle Forbes, Lawrence Richard Ingle Forbes, Elizabeth Ingle Forbes, Martin Stuart Ingle Forbes, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 22, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert O. Wells, Jr., Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer, Seattle, WA, for petitioners.

Donald E. Keener, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Before: POOLE, BRUNETTI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed the appeal of the Forbes family. It upheld the findings of the Immigration Judge (IJ) that the principle petitioner, Dr. Ronald Ingle Forbes, willfully made a material misrepresentation on his immigration application and was therefore deportable, and that the eligibility of the other family members depended on Dr. Forbes' status. The Forbes family petitions this court to review the BIA's decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases