CHIANESE v. MEIER


220 A.D.2d 264 (1995)

632 N.Y.S.2d 87

Josephine Chianese, Appellant, v. Werner Meier et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 10, 1995


Defendants' conduct was obstructive to orderly disclosure, but did not rise to the level that would justify the "ultimate penalty" of striking their answer (Virola v New York City Hous. Auth., 185 A.D.2d 122, 124). We modify as above indicated to hold defendants to their representations concerning the unavailability of the building's owner, superintendent and property manager at the time of the alleged incident, and to clarify the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases