1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 184 Ariz.
  5. 184 Ariz. 296 (1995)
 

STATE v. JACKSON

No. 1 CA-CV 94-0302.

184 Ariz. 296 (1995)

908 P.2d 1081

STATE of Arizona, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. L.Z. (Jack) JACKSON, dba A-Jax Bond Company, Real Party in Interest-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

December 19, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Ekstrom, Jr., Mohave County Attorney by James J. Zack, Deputy County Attorney, Kingman, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Danny L. Cowser, Flagstaff, for Real Party in Interest-Appellant.

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

In this case, we hold that the procedures for forfeiture of a bail bond are governed by Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure ("Ariz. R.Crim.P.") 7.6(d) and not by Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. ("A.R.S.") section 13-3973. We also hold that appellant Jackson ("A-Jax Bond Company") has failed to establish that the failure to set a forfeiture hearing within the time required by Rule 7.6(d) warrants reversal of the trial court's forfeiture...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases