SHAPERO v. BON NEUVE REALTY CORP.


221 A.D.2d 258 (1995)

634 N.Y.S.2d 379

Julius Shapero et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Bon Neuve Realty Corp. et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) 211 West 34th Street Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Kenkil Distributors, Inc., et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.) Kenkil Distributors, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. 211 West 34th Street Corporation, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 28, 1995


The determination that the individual defendants in actions numbers 1 and 2 violated paragraphs 11 and 48 of the lease, and thus were, not entitled to exercise the option to renew, was supported by the evidence (Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499). Since such violations negated substantial compliance with the lease and it cannot be said that the landlord was not injured by such noncompliance, defendants were not entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases