1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 216 A.D.2d
  5. 216 A.D.2d 261 (1995)
 

ARMAND-BYRD v. PAIK

216 A.D.2d 261 (1995)

627 N.Y.S.2d 978

Ericka L. Armand-Byrd et al., Respondents, v. Inok H. Paik, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 5, 1995

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant, we conclude that a jury could not find for the defendant by any rational process. Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law (see, Rhabb v New York City Hous. Auth., 41 N.Y.2d 200

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases