U.S. v. MILLER

No. 95-1039.

59 F.3d 417 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Carol A. MILLER a/k/a Carol Miller Salemo, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided July 5, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel C. Stretton (argued), West Chester, PA, for appellant.

Emily McKillip (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Michael R. Stiles, U.S. Atty., Walter S. Batty, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, PA, for appellee.

Before: STAPLETON, HUTCHINSON, and WEIS, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

In this criminal case, defendant contends that the trial court erred when it denied her request for an individual jury poll and instead conducted a collective inquiry. In the circumstances, we conclude that the trial court did not commit reversible error, but we adopt a prospective supervisory rule requiring that jurors shall be polled individually rather than collectively. We also affirm the trial court's rulings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases