MILOS v. EXXON CO., USA


281 N.J. Super. 194 (1995)

656 A.2d 1300

WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. EXXON CO., USA, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 2, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry M. Finn argued the cause for appellant (Schneider, Goldberger, Cohen, Finn, Solomon, Leder & Montalbano, attorneys).

Richard V. Jones argued the cause for respondent (Bressler, Amery & Ross, attorneys; Richard V. Jones and Noreen M. Bitetto, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ARIEL A. RODRIGUEZ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by ARIEL A. RODRIGUEZ, J.A.D.

In this worker's compensation appeal we must decide whether an employee's participation in an employer-funded, voluntary program to monitor the existence or progression of asbestos-related diseases constitutes medical treatment which extends the jurisdictional limitations period set by N.J.S.A. 34:15-27 for an application to review or modify an award (reopener). We hold that it does and reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases