IN RE WEINER

Docket No. D022093.

32 Cal.App.4th 441 (1995)

38 Cal. Rptr.2d 172

In re MURRAY WEINER on Habeas Corpus.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

February 2, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Jan Stiglitz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Edwin L. Miller, Jr., District Attorney, Richard J. Neely, Assistant District Attorney, Brian E. Michaels, Chief Deputy District Attorney, Thomas F. McArdle and James E. Atkins, Deputy District Attorneys, for Respondent.


OPINION

BENKE, Acting P.J.

Does the filing of an appeal by the People constitute a changed circumstance entitling the defendant to a bail review under Penal Code1 section 1275? Under the facts of this case, we answer that question in the negative and deny the petition.

BACKGROUND

After jury trial with Judge Napoleon Jones presiding, Murray...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases