1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 214 A.D.2d
  5. 214 A.D.2d 250 (1995)
 

HERLIHY v. METROPOLITAN

214 A.D.2d 250 (1995)

633 N.Y.S.2d 106

Cecile Herlihy, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Museum of Art, Defendant, and Ruth Zalinka et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 10, 1995

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne C. Vladeck of counsel (Judith P. Vladeck and Edward Hernstadt on the brief; Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, P. C., attorneys), for respondent.

Charles H. Kaplan of counsel (Elizabeth A. Alcorn and Alice B. Stock on the brief (Whitman Breed Abbott & Morgan, attorneys), for appellants.

MURPHY, P. J., RUBIN, ROSS and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

TOM, J.

This appeal raises the issue of whether statements made by workers to their employer, concerning certain anti-Semitic remarks allegedly made by a supervisor, are privileged communications and therefore, not actionable.

Plaintiff Cecile Herlihy was employed by defendant the Metropolitan Museum of Art (the Museum) for a period of more than 20 years and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases