The trial court properly excluded defendant's ballistics expert from testifying that a bullet lodged in the victim's leg, as depicted in certain X-rays in evidence, was deformed in a manner consistent with it having ricocheted up from the ground, offered in support of defendant's claim that he did not intentionally aim his gun at the victim. The expert, who was qualified in ballistics, but not in the reading of X-rays was nonetheless permitted to testify that the bullet depicted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
