CLARK v. SCOTT

No. 94-11125.

70 F.3d 386 (1995)

Rufus R. CLARK, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Wayne SCOTT, Director, Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 8, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erik E. Cary, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dan Morales, Atty. Gen., Austin, TX, for appellant.

F. Clinton Broden, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Ira R. Kirkendoll, Federal Public Defender, Dallas, TX, for appellee.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and WIENER, Circuit Judges.


E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question whether a state court is constitutionally required to conduct a Benavides balancing test1 before proceeding to try a criminal defendant who voluntarily absented himself from the trial after the jury was impaneled. Rufus Ray Clark, Jr., represented by an attorney, was tried and convicted in absentia of burglary by the state of Texas. Upon being later apprehended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases