STATE EX REL. GUISINGER v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 93-2621.

72 Ohio St.3d 383 (1995)

THE STATE EX REL. GUISINGER, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; CROWN-ZELLERBACH CORPORATION, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 28, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Liss, for appellee.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, Janis Rosenthal and Timothy E. Cowans, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

Two questions are presented: (1) Is mandamus the appropriate remedy? and (2) Did the commission err in offsetting claimant's entitlement to former R.C. 4123.57(A) compensation by amounts previously paid under former R.C. 4123.57(B) and (C)? We answer only the first question in the affirmative.

CZC asserts that declaratory judgment provides claimant with an adequate remedy at law, thereby barring mandamus relief. This argument is unpersuasive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases