RICARD v. ROSELAND AMUSEMENT & DEV. CORP.


215 A.D.2d 240 (1995)

626 N.Y.S.2d 186

Edward Ricard, Appellant, v. Roseland Amusement and Development Corporation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 16, 1995


The Supreme Court properly granted defendant Roseland's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case since plaintiff failed to introduce the testimony of a qualified expert in the field of security, leaving the jury to speculate as to any possible deficiencies in security at the dance club where plaintiff was injured, and what additional safety measures, if any, could reasonably have been undertaken...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases