COM. v. NAMACK


444 Pa.Super. 9 (1995)

663 A.2d 191

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Thomas NAMACK, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed August 2, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Geltner, Washington DC, amicus curiae.

Jay R. Rose, Paupach, for appellee Com.

Before WIEAND, BECK and BROSKY, JJ.


BECK, Judge:

Appellant Thomas Namack challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for defiant trespass, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3503(b)(1). Upon review of the parties' briefs, the record and the applicable law, we conclude that the evidence was insufficient to establish that appellant had the mens rea necessary to commit the crime of defiant trespass. We therefore reverse.

Appellant's conviction arose from his use of a trial leading...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases