RIVERA v. FORTUNATO


285 N.J. Super. 168 (1995)

666 A.2d 619

CARMELO RIVERA, PLAINTIFF, v. SAMUEL FORTUNATO, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, JOHN DOE AND RICHARD ROE, SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Passaic County.

Decided July 12, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Sieradzki for plaintiff (Goldstein, Ballen, O'Rourke & Wildstein, attorneys).

Dean J. Obeidallah for defendants Samuel Fortunato and the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Beattie Padovano, attorneys).


MINIMAN, J.S.C.

Defendants Samuel Fortunato, the New Jersey Commissioner of Insurance (the Commissioner), and the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (the Board) move for summary judgment under the verbal threshold contained in § 8 of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (the Reparation Reform Act). N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35. No reported decision has been found which addresses this issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases