1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 78 Wn.
  5. 78 Wn. App. 370 (1995)
 

BRUTSCHE v. CITY OF KENT

Nos. 34390-4-I; 34490-1-I.

78 Wn. App. 370 (1995)

898 P.2d 319

LEO C. BRUTSCHE, ET AL., Appellants, v. THE CITY OF KENT, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

June 26, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerald A. Klein and Roger A. Lubovich, for appellant.

Stewart A. Estes and Laura Evezich, for respondent.

AGID, J.

Seventy-three days after the Kent City Council (City) enacted its 1992 amendments to its zoning code rezoning 305 acres in the downtown core of the City, Leo C. and Robert Brutsche (Brutsche) filed a declaratory judgment complaint alleging that the amendments were facially unconstitutional. The trial court granted the City's motion for summary judgment, ruling that Brutsche's action was time-barred. Brutsche appeals, contending that the trial court should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases