1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 56 F.3d
  5. 56 F.3d 391 (1995)
 

HANSEL v. TOWN COURT FOR TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, N.Y.

No. 1168, Docket 94-7807.

56 F.3d 391 (1995)

Ronald HANSEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN COURT FOR the TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, NEW YORK; Town of Springfield, NY; Otsego County, New York; G. Oliver Koppell, Attorney General, New York, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided May 25, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Hansel, Richfield Spring, NY, pro se.

G. Oliver Koppell, Atty. Gen. of the State of N.Y., Peter H. Schiff, Deputy Sol. Gen., Peter G. Crary, and Frank K. Walsh, Asst. Attys. Gen., on the brief, for defendant-appellee Koppell.

James E. Konstanty, Oneonta, NY, on the brief, for defendant-appellee Otsego County.

Before: ALTIMARI, JACOBS and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:

Ronald Hansel ("Hansel"), proceeding pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, C.J.), dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). On appeal, Hansel asserts that the district court improperly held, on the merits, that the New York town court system is facially constitutional under North v. Russell, 427 U.S. 328

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases