1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 142 N.J.
  5. 142 N.J. 280 (1995)
 

CIRCLE CHEVROLET CO. v. GIORDANO, HALLERAN & CIESLA

142 N.J. 280 (1995)

662 A.2d 509

CIRCLE CHEVROLET COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND THOMAS J. DEFELICE, SR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GIORDANO, HALLERAN & CIESLA, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PETRICS, MESKIN, NASSAUR & DAMBACH, ACCOUNTS AND AUDITORS, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 1, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Lueddeke argued the cause for appellants.

Richard L. Friedman argued the cause for respondent Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, etc. (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, attorneys; Mr. Friedman, of counsel; Mr. Friedman, Lawrence J. Sharon, and Jodi L. Rosenberg, on the briefs).

Christopher J. Carey argued the cause for respondent Petrics, Meskin, Nassaur & Dambach, etc. (Tompkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld, attorneys; Mr. Carey, of counsel; Michael S. Miller and Mary Anne McConeghy, on the briefs).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, Justice.

This case involves the scope of the entire controversy doctrine as it applies to joinder of parties. At issue in this case, as well as, Mystic Isle Development Corp. v. Perskie & Nehmad, 142 N.J. 310, 662 A.2d 523, is whether the entire controversy doctrine applies to a malpractice action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases