1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 52 F.3d
  5. 52 F.3d 366 (1995)
 

B B & L, INC. v. N.L.R.B.

No. 93-1479.

52 F.3d 366 (1995)

B B & L, Inc., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 25, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick W. Ritchey, Pittsburgh, PA, argued the cause for the petitioner. On brief was Brooke Bashore-Smith, Newark, DE. Peter D. Post, Pittsburgh, PA, entered an appearance.

Joseph J. Jablonski, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, argued the cause for the respondent. On brief were Linda R. Sher, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC.

Before WILLIAMS, HENDERSON and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Circuit Judge TATEL filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

PER CURIAM:

B B & L, Inc. (B B & L) petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) holding that B B & L violated sections 8(a)(1), (5) and 2(6), (7) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1), (5) and 152(6), (7), by refusing to bargain with the Drivers and Employees of the Petroleum Industry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases