DELGAUDIO v. RODRIGUERA


280 N.J. Super. 135 (1995)

654 A.2d 1007

RAYMOND DELGAUDIO AND MARTHA DELGAUDIO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ERNESTO RODRIGUERA, M.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 13, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Drew Britcher argued the cause for appellants (Stern Steiger Croland, attorneys; Mr. Britcher, Mindy Michaels Roth and Armand Leone, Jr., on the brief).

Evelyn C. Farkas argued the cause for respondent (Francis & Berry, attorneys; Ms. Farkas, of counsel; Peter A. Olsen, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CONLEY and NEWMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONLEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal a jury verdict resulting in a dismissal of their medical malpractice complaint and based upon a jury finding that they had not demonstrated that defendant deviated from standard medical practice in his treatment of plaintiff, Raymond Delgaudio (hereinafter plaintiff). We conclude that the trial court erred in precluding plaintiff from using, during his examinations of defendant and defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases