COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS & OPPORTUNITIES v. WINDSOR HALL REST HOME

(14983)

232 Conn. 181 (1995)

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES v. WINDSOR HALL REST HOME ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released February 7, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Krich, staff attorney, with whom was Philip A. Murphy, Jr., commission counsel, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Lissa J. Paris, with whom was Hugh F. Murray III, for the appellee (named defendant).

PETERS, C. J., and BORDEN, BERDON, NORCOTT and PALMER, JS.


BORDEN, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, the oral decision of a presiding officer at an administrative hearing of the commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) dismissing a complaint was a "final decision" of the commission within the meaning of General Statutes § 4-183 (c),1 so as to trigger the forty-five day time period within which a party must appeal. The trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases