REYNOLDS v. CITY OF NEW YORK


221 A.D.2d 185 (1995)

633 N.Y.S.2d 300

Herman Reynolds et al., Plaintiffs, v. City of New York, Appellant, and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Defendants American Bridge Division et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Winston Lester, Plaintiff, v. William Ladson, Defendant, and City of New York, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. American Bridge Division et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 9, 1995


The City's contention that summary judgment was improperly based on inadmissible evidence is improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and, in any event, is without merit. Contrary to defendant's claim, the statement in the offending driver's MV-104 report constituted an admission which could properly be considered as probative evidence by the motion court. Moreover, even if the complained of reports were wholly disregarded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases