1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 52 F.3d
  5. 52 F.3d 353 (1995)
 

MURRAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nos. 94-7062, 94-7063.

52 F.3d 353 (1995)

Joseph P. MURRAY, et al., Appellants, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 21, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Achim Kriegsheim argued the cause and filed the brief, Washington, DC, for appellants.

Mary L. Wilson, Asst. Corp. Counsel, argued the cause, Washington, DC, for appellee. With her on the brief were Garland Pinkston, Acting Corp. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Lutz A. Prager, Asst. Deputy Corp. Counsel.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge; WILLIAMS and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

In these consolidated appeals, Joseph P. Murray and others challenge orders of the district court denying their motions for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Because appellants failed to file an opposition or otherwise present a potentially meritorious claim or defense to the District of Columbia's motion to dismiss their amended complaint in No. 94-7062...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases