The IAS Court, in denying leave to amend, correctly determined that the proposed counterclaims were merely a disingenuous attempt to assert a negligent supervision claim against plaintiff natural guardian in contravention of well-settled New York law, which recognizes that a claim for negligent supervision of a child, however worded, is not a viable cause of action cognizable at law (Holodook v Spencer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MORALES v. FELICE PROPS. CORP.
221 A.D.2d 181 (1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 305
Eunice M. Morales, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Martha Medrano, et al., Respondents, v. Felice Properties Corp. et al., Defendants, and Stuart Morgan et al., Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 9, 1995
November 9, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
