Requiring defendants to post a bond would not deprive them of their day in court, it being clear that defendants have property that can be liquidated, and was otherwise a proper exercise of discretion (see, Rubin v Payne,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PHILIP GLICK SUPPLY CO. v. SATTERWHITE
215 A.D.2d 179 (1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 149
Philip Glick Supply Co., Respondent, v. Steve Satterwhite et al., Defendants, and Paul Balme et al., Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 9, 1995
May 9, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.