BRADY v. ZAMBRANA


221 A.D.2d 171 (1995)

633 N.Y.S.2d 139

Mathew Brady, Respondent, v. George Zambrana et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 2, 1995


The sanctions imposed by the IAS Court, the striking of the answer and entry of a default judgment, was proper (see, Besson v Beirne, 188 A.D.2d 330). Defendants' counsel offered as an excuse for defendant Zambrana's failure to appear for his deposition counsel's inability to contact Zambrana. Counsel further claimed that her ability to comply with document requests had been "frustrated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases