Defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied since the court properly excluded the fifteen days between March 22 and April 6, 1993 upon the ground that the adjournment was precipitated by the failure of counsel for the codefendant to appear and the need to ascertain whether the codefendant was, in fact, represented by counsel (CPL 30.30 [4] [f]). Without this fifteen day period, there was insufficient includable time to require dismissal. Moreover, the court should...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
