1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 216 A.D.2d
  5. 216 A.D.2d 166 (1995)
 

WEINSTOCK v. HANDLER

216 A.D.2d 166 (1995)

628 N.Y.S.2d 108

Israel Weinstock et al., Respondents, v. Emmerich Handler et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 22, 1995

Plaintiff's commencement of the related Federal action against defendants and his continued defense in the related Kings County action are sufficient to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his delay in the instant action and lack of intent to abandon it (see, Rodriguez v Middle Atl. Auto Leasing, 122 A.D.2d 720, appeal dismissed 69 N.Y.2d 874). And the merit of the instant action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases