WALKER v. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.

Nos. 92-15977, 92-15979, 92-15982, 92-15983 and 92-15985.

62 F.3d 300 (1995)

Albert C. WALKER; Roberta M. Walker; John C. Soso; Jacklyn C. Soso; Margaret Smith; Alyce Crosdale; Betty Sands, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant, and United States Department of Education; Lamar Alexander, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. WALKER; Roberta M. Walker; John C. Soso; Jacklyn C. Soso; Margaret Smith; Alyce Crosdale; Betty Sands, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, City and County of San Francisco, State of California; Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District; San Francisco Unified School District, Defendants-Appellants. Albert C. WALKER; Roberta M. Walker; John C. Soso; Jacklyn C. Soso; Margaret Smith; Alyce Crosdale; Betty Sands, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, City and County of San Francisco, State of California, Defendant, and Deborah Martin; Jacob Perea; Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. WALKER; Roberta M. Walker; John C. Soso; Jacklyn C. Soso; Margaret Smith; Alyce Crosdale; Betty Sands, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William HONIG, as California Superintendent of Public Instruction; California Department of Education; California State Board of Education, Defendants-Appellants, and San Francisco Unified School District, Defendant. Albert C. WALKER; Roberta M. Walker; John C. Soso; Jacklyn C. Soso; Margaret Smith; Alyce Crosdale; Betty Sands, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California; Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District, Defendants-Appellees, United States Department of Education; Deborah Martin; Lamar Alexander, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education; Jacob Perea; Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 2, 1995.


ORDER

The order denying the petition for rehearing and rejecting the suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed on July 5, 1995, is ordered published, along with Judge Reinhardt's dissent from the order rejecting the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Filed July 5, 1995

Before: Thomas TANG, Stephen S. TROTT, and Ferdinand F. FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny rehearing and to reject rehearing en banc.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases