MATEO v. MATEO


281 N.J. Super. 73 (1995)

656 A.2d 846

PETRA MATEO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MANOLIN MATEO, GRACE R. GARRETT AND ERNEST GARRETT, DEFENDANTS, AND DARRELL FINEMAN, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 20, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Petra Mateo, appellant, filed a pro se brief.

Capizola, Fineman & Lapham, attorneys for respondent (Barbara R. Lapham, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY, LONG and A.M. STEIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, P.J.A.D.

The dispute in this appeal is between plaintiff and Darrell Fineman, Esq., the attorney who represented her when she commenced this personal-injury automobile negligence action. Plaintiff appeals from an order restraining her from continuing a proceeding she had commenced against Fineman in the Fee Arbitration Committee pursuant to R. 1:20A-3. The trial judge based his order on plaintiff's failure to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases